Three-year follow-up of a novel orthopedic ward fracture liaison services (OWFLS) model.

OBJECTIVE: We established an orthopedic ward fracture liaison services (OWFLS) model and evaluated its role in improving detection rates of bone metabolic markers, treatment rates, and long-term treatability. METHODS: This observational retrospective cohort study included 120 patients aged >50 years hospitalized for primary osteoporotic fracture from January 2018 to January 2019 (group A: not included in OWFLS). Group B (included in OWFLS) comprised 120 patients from February 2019 to February 2020. We compared rates of bone metabolic index testing, treatment, and adherence; symptomatic improvement; and recurrent fracture between groups. RESULTS: Rates of bone metabolism index testing (50% vs. 0%) and medication use (94.2% vs. 64.2%) were significantly higher after OWFLS implementation. There was no significant difference in adherence rates at 3 months between groups (97.3% vs. 93.5%). Adherence rates at 1 and 3 years were better in group B than A (73.5% vs. 51.9%; 57.5% vs. 26%, respectively). Recurrence of bone pain at 1 and 3 years was significantly lower in group B than A (20.4% vs. 46.8%; 45.1% vs. 76.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OWFLS improved the detection rate of bone metabolism indicators, treatment rate, and patient adherence and reduced recurrence of bone pain. OWFLS may be suitable for settings lacking human resources.

Deep learning in the radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis: a literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is a systemic bone disease characterized by low bone mass, damaged bone microstructure, increased bone fragility, and susceptibility to fractures. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, a series of studies have reported deep learning applications in the screening and diagnosis of osteoporosis. The aim of this review was to summary the application of deep learning methods in the radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis. METHODS: We conducted a two-step literature search using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. In this review, we focused on routine radiologic methods, such as X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, used to opportunistically screen for osteoporosis. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies were included in this review. These studies were divided into three categories: osteoporosis screening (n = 20), bone mineral density prediction (n = 13), and osteoporotic fracture risk prediction and detection (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning has demonstrated a remarkable capacity for osteoporosis screening. However, clinical commercialization of a diagnostic model for osteoporosis remains a challenge.

[Expert consensus on integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine diagnosis and treatment for osteoporotic fractures].

Osteoporotic fractures represent the most severe complications of osteoporosis,characterized by insidious onset,high mortality and disability rates,and a steadily increasing incidence,imposing a significant socioeconomic burden. Western medicine has advantages in diagnosis and surgical interventions,while traditional Chinese medicine excels in holistic management and the restoration of bodily equilibrium. The integration of both traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and western medicine emerges as an effective therapeutic strategy for osteoporotic fractures. In order to propagate the concept of integrated diagnosis and treatment,foster the advancement of integrated medical techniques for osteoporotic fractures,and establish standardized and normative protocols for disease prevention,diagnosis,and treatment,a consensus expert group,led by Geriatric Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society,the Young Osteoporosis Group of Orthopedics Branch of Chinese Medical Association,Osteoporosis Group of Orthopedics Branch of Chinese Physician Association,and Osteoporosis Professional Committee of the Shanghai Society of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,was established. This group engaged in deliberations and formulated the "Expert Consensus on Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporotic Fractures" elucidating the concept of integrated medicine and offering recommendations in the domains of prevention,diagnosis,and treatment,with the aspiration of ameliorating the prognosis of osteoporotic fractures and enhancing the quality of life for these patients.

[Secondary fracture prevention/Update osteoporosis guidelines 2023 of the Umbrella Organization Osteology]. / Sekundäre Frakturprävention/Update Leitlinie Osteoporose 2023 des Dachverbandes Osteologie.

The S3 guidelines on the prophylaxis, diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis 2023 were completely revised and updated between 2021 and 2023 in accordance with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies of Germany (AWMF) regulations. The guideline committee consisted of delegates from the 20 specialist societies of the Umbrella Organization Osteology (Dachverband Osteologie, DVO) as well as delegates from the German Society of General Medicine and Family Medicine (DEGAM), the German Society for Nephrology (DGfN) and the Federal Self-help Association for Osteoporosis (BfO).The guidelines focus on preventive measures, diagnostic procedures and treatment approaches for osteoporosis in men aged 50 years and over and postmenopausal women. The main aim is the optimization of care processes, reduction of fracture incidences and maintenance or improvement of the quality of life and functional capacity of patients affected by fractures. A major update to the guidelines includes the introduction of a new risk calculator that can take more risk factors (n = 33) into account and that can estimate the risk of vertebral body and proximal femoral fractures for a 3-year period (previously 10 years). This results in new thresholds for diagnostics and treatment. The programmed app is currently not yet certified as a medical product and a paper version is therefore currently available for patient care with the planned integration of a web-based version of the risk calculator. From the perspective of trauma surgery, the recommendations and innovations for manifest osteoporosis are of particular clinical importance. The focus of the DVO guidelines update is therefore on the implementation of secondary fracture prevention in trauma surgery, orthopedic and geriatric traumatology in the clinical and practical daily routine.

Analyzing the risk of osteoporosis and fracture in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have been treated with various biologics.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a major risk factor for osteoporosis/osteoporotic fractures. We aimed to elucidate the role of treatment choices among osteoporosis/osteoporotic fractures. METHODOLOGY: We utilized the Chang-Gung Research Database to assess the risks of osteoporosis/osteoporotic fractures among independently treated RA patients, using retrospective time-to-event outcomes analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3509 RA patients with a mean of 63.1 ± 8.6 years were analyzed. Among all, 1300 RA patients (37%) were diagnosed with newly diagnosed osteoporosis. The crude incidence of newly diagnosed osteoporosis was the highest among those treated with other conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs; 74.1 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 66.0-82.3), followed by those with a non-treatment period (68 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 63.1-72.9), methotrxate (MTX) monotherapy (60.7 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 41.2-80.3), MTX plus other cDMARDs (51.9 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 43.4-60.3), and abatacept/rituximab (48.6 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 14.9-82.3). The lowest crude incidence was found in patients treated with anti-TNFi biologics (40.4 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 28.6-52.2) and other biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; 40.1 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 8.0-72.1). A total of 270 patients (20.8%) suffered from an incident fracture during follow-ups. The crude incidence of fracture was the highest among those treated with abatacept/rituximab (49.0 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 6.0-91.9), followed by those with non-treatment periods (24.3 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 19.3-29.4), other cDMARDs (24.2 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 18.1-30.2), anti-TNFi biologics (20.2 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 8.8-31.6). Other bDMARDs (13.3 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 0-39.2), MTX mono (12.5 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 0.3-24.8), and MTX plus other cDMARDs (11.4 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 5.4-17.4) were low incidences. CONCLUSION: The treatment option has emerged as a critical determinant in the context of future osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture risks among RA. These findings offer a valuable resource for clinicians, empowering them to tailor bespoke treatment strategies for RA patients, thereby mitigating the potential for future osteoporosis and fractures.

The relationship between vertebral compression rates and systemic inflammatory scores in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

OBJECTIVE: There are many scientific reports on systemic inflammation scores (SIS) associated with decreased bone mineral density in osteoporotic vertebral disease. However, there are no studies on the association of inflammation scores with the risk of collapse in osteoporotic vertebral collapse fractures. The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between the product of platelet and neutrophil counts (PPN), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) derived from complete blood count analysis in cases of osteoporotic vertebral fractures and fracture severity based on vertebral collapse rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 50 patients aged 50 years or older who presented with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and underwent kyphoplasty at our clinic from 2018 to 2023. The study included both men and women. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to diagnose and differentiate osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures from burst fractures and pathologic fractures. All compression rate measurements were performed with CT. The compression rate of the most affected vertebra (MAV-CR) was calculated. Groups were divided into two categories based on their compression rates: <50% and ≥50%. Initial PPN, PLR, NLR, and SII parameters were used as systemic inflammation scores. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between MAV-CR groups in PPN, PLR, NLR, and SII parameters (p>0.05). No statistically significant correlation was observed between inflammation scores and MAV-CR groups (p>0.05). In this comparison, no significant difference was observed between the selected CBC parameters and the groups divided according to the compression rate (WBC: p=0.725, PC: p=0.069, NC: p=0.732, LC: p=0.513). ROC analysis was performed to analyze the diagnostic tests (AUC=0.372 for PPN, AUC=0.509 for PLR, AUC=0.525 for NLR, and AUC=0.435 for SII). None of the systemic inflammation scores had any predictive value for osteoporotic vertebral collapse fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Although it has been established in the scientific literature that systemic inflammation scores are associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, our analysis indicates no statistically significant correlation between the parameters of PPN, PLR, NLR, and SII and the severity of compression fractures in individuals with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In this study, using systemic inflammation scores as a predictive test for the severity of osteoporotic vertebral fractures does not seem appropriate.

Clinical Use of Trabecular Bone Score: The 2023 ISCD Official Positions.

Osteoporosis can currently be diagnosed by applying the WHO classification to bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, skeletal factors other than BMD contribute to bone strength and fracture risk. Lumbar spine TBS, a grey-level texture measure which is derived from DXA images has been extensively studied, enhances fracture prediction independent of BMD and can be used to adjust fracture probability from FRAX® to improve risk stratification. The purpose of this International Society for Clinical Densitometry task force was to review the existing evidence and develop recommendations to assist clinicians regarding when and how to perform, report and utilize TBS. Our review concluded that TBS is most likely to alter clinical management in patients aged ≥ 40 years who are close to the pharmacologic intervention threshold by FRAX. The TBS value from L1-L4 vertebral levels, without vertebral exclusions, should be used to calculate adjusted FRAX probabilities. L1-L4 vertebral levels can be used in the presence of degenerative changes and lumbar compression fractures. It is recommended not to report TBS if extreme structural or pathological artifacts are present. Monitoring and reporting TBS change is unlikely to be helpful with the current version of the TBS algorithm. The next version of TBS software will include an adjustment based upon directly measured tissue thickness. This is expected to improve performance and address some of the technical factors that affect the current algorithm which may require modifications to these Official Positions as experience is acquired with this new algorithm.

An overview of the use of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in osteoporosis.

FRAX®, a simple-to-use fracture risk calculator, was first released in 2008 and since then has been used increasingly worldwide. By calculating the 10-year probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture, it assists clinicians when deciding whether further investigation, for example a bone mineral density measurement (BMD), and/or treatment is needed to prevent future fractures. In this review, we explore the literature around osteoporosis and how FRAX has changed its management. We present the characteristics of this tool and describe the use of thresholds (diagnostic and therapeutic). We also present arguments as to why screening with FRAX should be considered. FRAX has several limitations which are described in this review. This review coincides with the release of a version, FRAXplus, which addresses some of these limitations.

Assessment for bone health in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma after postoperative thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression therapy: a new fracture risk assessment algorithm.

Purpose: The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) is used to assess the 10-year risk of major site and hip fractures; however, whether this tool can be applied to patients receiving levothyroxine-based thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppressive therapy for postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients is yet to be clarified. Methods and design: A total of 64 patients with DTC following thyroidectomy and oral levothyroxine for TSH suppression therapy and 30 gender- and age-matched controls were collected. The fracture risk was compared between the affected groups with different TSH levels. FRAX was used to calculate the fracture risk with and without bone mineral density (BMD). The TSH level was converted to an age-weighted score to estimate the fracture risk of postoperatively differentiated thyroid cancer patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the AUC curve of the traditional FRAX and the new algorithm for osteoporosis diagnosis were compared. The dual-energy X-ray bone mineral density measurement T score was used as the gold standard to diagnose osteoporosis. Results: There were 24 patients in the T ≥ -1-2.5 group, 23 in the -2.5 < T < -1 group, and 17 in the T ≤ -2.5 group. The T score of BMD in the disease group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The risk of MOF and hip fracture without a T score were significantly different under various TSH levels (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of FRAX without BMD for predicting major osteoporotic fractures (PMOF) and major hip fractures (PHF) was 0.694 and 0.683, respectively. The cutoff values were 2.15% and 0.25%, respectively. The AUC of FRAX with BMD for PMOF and PHF was 0.976 and 0.989, respectively, and the cutoff values were 4.15% and 1.1%, respectively. The AUC of FRAX without BMD for PMOF and PHF was 0.708 and 0.72, respectively, and the cutoff values were 5.5% and 1.55%, respectively. Conclusions: FRAX is suitable for postoperative DTC patients after TSH suppressive therapy. In the absence of BMD, TSH weighted by age can improve the specificity of FRAX in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in this population.

AI algorithms for accurate prediction of osteoporotic fractures in patients with diabetes: an up-to-date review.

Osteoporotic fractures impose a substantial burden on patients with diabetes due to their unique characteristics in bone metabolism, limiting the efficacy of conventional fracture prediction tools. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have shown great promise in predicting osteoporotic fractures. This review aims to evaluate the application of traditional fracture prediction tools (FRAX, QFracture, and Garvan FRC) in patients with diabetes and osteoporosis, review AI-based fracture prediction achievements, and assess the potential efficiency of AI algorithms in this population. This comprehensive literature search was conducted in Pubmed and Web of Science. We found that conventional prediction tools exhibit limited accuracy in predicting fractures in patients with diabetes and osteoporosis due to their distinct bone metabolism characteristics. Conversely, AI algorithms show remarkable potential in enhancing predictive precision and improving patient outcomes. However, the utilization of AI algorithms for predicting osteoporotic fractures in diabetic patients is still in its nascent phase, further research is required to validate their efficacy and assess the potential advantages of their application in clinical practice.

Age-dependent gender differences in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis during hospitalization in patients with fragility fractures.

BACKGROUND: There is a gender difference in the acceptance of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in patients after fragility fractures, but this difference is rarely assessed during hospitalization, and it is unclear whether these differences are age-dependent. This study aimed to evaluate the differences between male and female fragility fracture patients of different age groups who received the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis during hospitalization. METHODS: 31,265 fragility fracture patients aged ≥ 50 years from the Fragility Fracture Management Database in a high-volume orthopedic hospital from December 2019 to February 2023 were included in this study. We compared the differences in the rates of men and women with fragility fracture who received the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism biochemical markers (BMBMs) and treatment with anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs), and follow-up to the internal medicine clinic within 3 months after discharge, across all age groups and across different age stages (50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥ 80 years). RESULTS: The detection rates of female patients receiving BMD and BMBMs during hospitalization were 31.88% and 5.30%, respectively, compared with 22.23% and 2.69% for men. The rate of receiving any AOMs treatment was 44.63% for women and 31.60% for men. The follow-up rate of returning to the internal medicine clinic within 3 months after discharge was 9.79% for women compared to 3.00% for men. There was a significant difference between males compared to females (P < 0.0001). Analysis of patients by different age group revealed that differences in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis were found only in patients under 80 years of age, while gender differences in the return to the internal medicine clinic for follow-up after discharge were present in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gender differences present in osteoporosis management in patients with fragility fracture during hospitalization, especially for patients under 80 years of age. This finding suggests that orthopedic surgeons neglect to manage osteoporosis in male patients with fragility fracture during hospitalization.

Effect of bedside health education for elderly patients with fragility fracture by specialist physicians on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis during hospitalization and the visiting rate to osteoporosis clinic after discharge in a high-volume orthopedic hospital.

We retrospectively analyzed 12,999 elderly patients with fragility fracture and found that the detection rate of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs), the treatment rate of osteoporosis, and the visiting rate to the osteoporosis specialist clinic after discharge are significantly enhanced in fragility fracture patients after receiving health education on osteoporosis-related knowledge during hospitalization. PURPOSE: To observe the effect of health education on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis during hospitalization and the rate of come back to osteoporosis clinic after discharge in elderly patients with fragility fracture. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 12,999 elderly patients with fragility fracture admitted to Xi'an Honghui Hospital from March 2021 to December 2022. The patients were divided into the health education group and the non-health education group according to whether they received health education on osteoporosis-related knowledge during hospitalization. The diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis during hospitalization and the outpatient treatment of osteoporosis after discharge were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among the 7784 patients in the health education group, 4551 (58.47%) received BMD test, 798 (10.25%) received BTMs test, 3990 (51.26%) received anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs) treatment, and 1232 (15.83%) came back to the osteoporosis specialist clinic after discharge. Among the 5215 patients in the non-health education group, 681 (13.06%) received BMD test, 6 (0.12%) received BTMs test, 2071 (39.71%) received AOMs treatment, and 440 (8.44%) came back to the osteoporosis specialist clinic within one month after discharge. CONCLUSION: The education of osteoporosis-related knowledge for patients with fragility fracture contribute to enhance the detection rate of BMD and BTMs and the treatment rate of osteoporosis during hospitalization, and increase the rate of coming back to the osteoporosis clinic after discharge.

A simple fragility fracture risk score for type 2 diabetes patients: a derivation, validation, comparison, and risk stratification study.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to develop and validate 2 simple scores for stratification of the risks of (1) any fragility (AF) and (2) major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients; we also compared the performance of these scores with that of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and its adjustments. DESIGN AND METHODS: In this longitudinal cohort study, 1855 patients with T2D were enrolled from January 2015 to August 2019. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to model the 5-year risk of AF and MOF. These scores were internally validated using a bootstrap resampling method of 1000. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5 years, 119 (6.42%) cases of AF and 92 (4.96%) cases of MOFs were identified. Both the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots indicated improved identification performance using the newly established scores. Furthermore, these scores also showed improved outcomes regarding the decision curve analysis (DCA) and area under the curve (AUC) compared to the widely used FRAX and its derivatives. More importantly, these scores successfully separated T2D patients into risk groups according to significant differences in fracture incidence. CONCLUSIONS: These novel scores enable simple and reliable fracture risk stratification in T2D patients. Future work is needed to validate these findings in external cohort(s).

[Update of the S3-guideline on diagnostics, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis]. / Update der S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Prophylaxe und Therapie der Osteoporose.

With the aid of a new fracture risk model, the great treatment gap for osteoporosis should be closed. All patients older than 70 years should undergo a diagnostic procedure for osteoporosis. An additional risk threshold (≥ 10% per 3 years for femoral and vertebral fractures) should enable patients with a high risk of fracture to be treated with osteoanabolic agents. The use of osteoanabolic agents makes it necessary to administer antiresorptive drugs afterwards. Due to the low event rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw, the initiation of a specific osteoporosis treatment should not be delayed by prophylactic dental treatment. The adherence to the drug treatment should be improved by an individualized approach on the basis of a cooperation between patients, caregivers, and physicians. A regular assessment of falls, including the timed up and go test should be carried out in patients older than 70 years.

Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters.

OBJECTIVE: This was a single-center retrospective study that aimed to measure the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) in people of all ages and compare changes in VBQ across ages. Differences in VBQ under various MRI parameters were compared. METHODS: We first screened patients without underlying disease and no history of fractures who underwent lumbar MRI in our center in the past four years. Over the span of 10 years, 200 patients (100 males and 100 females) were randomly recruited into each cohort to undergo 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI scans. Subsequently, we tabulated the number of patients admitted to our hospital with OVCF over the past four years. There were 30 healthy adults under 4 times of MRI scans in different parameters to determine the differentiation of VBQ. The 30 healthy adults were recruited to validate the differentiation of VBQ under various parameters. RESULTS: A total of 2400 patients without OVCF and 405 patients with OVCF were enrolled. The VBQ value of 1.5 T was significantly higher compared with that of 3.0 T (2.769 ± 0.494 > 2.199 ± 0.432, P < 0.0001). VBQ of 43.31 kHz in 1.5 T was significantly lower than that of 35.36 kHz (2.447 ± 0.350 < 2.632 ± 0.280, P < 0.05). The differentiation of VBQ in 1.5 T and 3.0 T was validated using results of healthy adults. CONCLUSIONS: VBQ is an effective tool for differentiating patients with OVCF and can be used as a primary screening tool for osteoporosis. However, VBQ is significantly affected by magnetic field intensity and bandwidth and cannot achieve its universality as it originally proposed.

[Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures]. / Osteoporotische Wirbelkörperfrakturen.

The number of osteoporotic fractures of the spine is increasing. These fractures are associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. This article provides an overview of the special features of these fractures, the diagnostic procedure, their classification, and the conservative and surgical treatment options. For the mostly elderly patients, it is important to treat the underlying disease and to address associated problems such as frailty and sarcopenia. To meet this growing medical and socio-economic challenge, a holistic interdisciplinary and interprofessional treatment approach is required.

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) Can Identify Patients at High Risk of Fracture but Require Substantial Race Adjustments to Currently Available Fracture Risk Calculators.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic fracture prediction calculators are poorly utilized in primary care, leading to underdiagnosis and undertreatment of those at risk for fracture. The use of these calculators could be improved if predictions were automated using the electronic health record (EHR). However, this approach is not well validated in multi-ethnic populations, and it is not clear if the adjustments for race or ethnicity made by calculators are appropriate. OBJECTIVE: To investigate EHR-generated fracture predictions in a multi-ethnic population. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from the EHR. SETTING: An urban, academic medical center in Philadelphia, PA. PARTICIPANTS: 12,758 White, 7,844 Black, and 3,587 Hispanic patients seeking routine care from 2010 to 2018 with mean 3.8 years follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: FRAX and QFracture, two of the most used fracture prediction tools, were studied. Risk for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture were calculated using data from the EHR at baseline and compared to the number of fractures that occurred during follow-up. RESULTS: MOF rates varied from 3.2 per 1000 patient-years in Black men to 7.6 in White women. FRAX and QFracture had similar discrimination for MOF prediction (area under the curve, AUC, 0.69 vs. 0.70, p=0.08) and for hip fracture prediction (AUC 0.77 vs 0.79, p=0.21) and were similar by race or ethnicity. FRAX had superior calibration than QFracture (calibration-in-the-large for FRAX 0.97 versus QFracture 2.02). The adjustment factors used in MOF prediction were generally accurate in Black women, but underestimated risk in Black men, Hispanic women, and Hispanic men. LIMITATIONS: Single center design. CONCLUSIONS: Fracture predictions using only EHR inputs can discriminate between high and low risk patients, even in Black and Hispanic patients, and could help primary care physicians identify patients who need screening or treatment. However, further refinements to the calculators may better adjust for race-ethnicity.

Gastrointestinal disease is an important influencing factor of osteoporosis fracture:a retrospective study in chinese postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUD: The influencing factors of osteoporosis are complex, the incidence of osteoporosis is higher in middle-aged and elderly women, and osteoporotic fractures (OF) can seriously affect quality of life. Currently, the correlation analysis between gastrointestinal diseases and OF focuses more on diseases such as gastric cancer and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study analyzed the risk factors for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in 1567 postmenopausal women in Fuzhou, China. The purpose is to explore the potential influence of gastrointestinal diseases on the occurrence of OF. METHODS: According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 1567 subjects were included in the analysis of OP risk factors, including 647 in the OP group and 920 in the NOP group. A total of 616 subjects were included in the analysis of correlation between OF and gastrointestinal diseases, including 132 in OF group and 484 in NF group. Statistical analysis shows that age (OR = 1.062, 95% CI = 1.045-1.080), height (OR = 0.089, 95% CI = 0.009-0.857), weight (OR = 0.981,95% CI = 0.967-0.995) and nature of work (P = 0.010) are the main risk factors for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in southeast China, and gastrointestinal diseases (OR = 1.583, 95% CI = 1.070-2.343) and height (OR = 0.003, 95% CI = 0.000-0.104) are the main risk factors of OF. CONCLUSIONS: The main factors affecting the occurrence of OP in postmenopausal women in southeast China are individual characteristic. Gastrointestinal diseases that do not directly affect BMD increase the risk of OF in osteoporotic patients.

Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis.

BACKGROUND: Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) are osteoporotic pelvic fractures or insufficiency pelvic fractures caused by the low energy injury or stress fracture in daily livings in the elderly more than 60 years, which the incidence is increasing with the aging population in our country. FFPs result in considerable morbidity and mortality and as well as massive financial burden on the already strained health systems throughout the world. METHODS: This clinical guideline was initiated by the Trauma Orthopedic Branch of Chinese Orthopedic Association; the External Fixation and Limb Reconstruction Branch of Chinese Orthopedic Association; the National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation; Senior Department of Orthopedics of Chinese PLA general hospital; the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University. The grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach and the reporting items for practice guidelines in healthcare (RIGHT) checklist were adopted. RESULTS: 22 evidence based recommendations were formulated based on 22 most concerned clinical problems among orthopedic surgeons in China. CONCLUSION: Understanding these trends through this guideline will facilitate better clinical care of FFP patients by medical providers and better allocation of resources by policy makers.